河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 82-89.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2019.05.012

• 经济学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

如何征收房产税更有利于调节收入分配——基于城镇住户调查数据的模拟分析

杜莉,郭玮琳   

  1. 复旦大学 经济学院, 上海 200433
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-12 出版日期:2019-09-25 发布日期:2019-09-25
  • 作者简介:杜莉(1972—),女,辽宁本溪人,复旦大学经济学院教授、博士生导师,主要研究方向:财税理论与政策。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“中国特色公共经济理论与政策研究”(11&ZD073)

How Can House Property Tax Improve Income Distribution ——A Simulation Analysis Based on Urban Household Survey Data

DU Li,GUO Wei-lin   

  1. School of Economics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Received:2019-06-12 Online:2019-09-25 Published:2019-09-25

摘要: 利用国家统计局2012年城镇住户调查数据,对窄税基低税率、窄税基高税率、窄税基累进税率、宽税基低税率、宽税基高税率和宽税基累进税率六种征收模式下房产税的收入分配效应进行模拟测算可以发现,窄税基模式调节收入分配的效果优于宽税基模式,其中窄税基高税率的征收模式在调节收入分配方面的效果又优于窄税基累进税率和窄税基低税率的模式,同时房产税的收入分配效应存在着显著的地区差异。因此,在房产税改革初期,宜采用窄税基高税率的征收模式;同时考虑到地区差异,在上海等居民人均收入高而住房面积低的地区,宜适当提高免税面积和税率。

关键词: 房产税, 收入再分配, 税收累进性

Abstract: Based on the 2012 urban household survey data from National Bureau of Statistics, this paper simulates the income distribution effects of China's house property tax under six modes:narrow tax base low tax rate, narrow taxbase high tax rate, narrow tax base progressive tax rate, wide tax base low tax rate, wide tax base high tax rate and wide tax base progressive tax rate. The results are better than the broad tax base model, in which the narrow tax base and the nigh tax rate are better than the narrow tax base progressive tax rate and the narrow tax base low tax rate in regulating the distribution of income. At the same time, there are significant regional differences in the income distribution effect of real estate tax. Therefore, in the early stage of the refore of real estate tax,it is advisable to adopt a narrow base high tax rate. Considering the regional differences, in areas with high per-capita income, such as Shanghai, the tax-free area and tax rate should be increased appropriately.

Key words: house property tax, income distribution, tax progressivity

中图分类号: