河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 133-139.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2016.01.023

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

论虚构专名的意义

刘叶涛,孟令芳   

  1. 燕山大学 文法学院,河北 秦皇岛066004
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-14 出版日期:2016-01-25 发布日期:2016-01-25
  • 作者简介:刘叶涛(1977-),男,河北沧州人,博士,教授,南京大学现代逻辑与逻辑应用研究所研究员,主要研究方向:现代逻辑与分析哲学。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省高校学科拔尖人才选拔与培养计划项目(BR2-253);教育部人文社会科学基金项目(15YJC72040001);河北省高等学校科学研究项目(BJ2016087)

On the Meaning of Fictional Proper Names

LIU Ye-tao, MENG Ling-fang   

  1. College of Humanities and Law, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066004, China
  • Received:2015-01-14 Online:2016-01-25 Published:2016-01-25

摘要: 克里普克所代表的直接指称理论因空名问题而受到质疑。《空名与虚构实体》一文着重论述的是克里普克对虚构专名这种空专名的基本观点。通过文献解读可以为直接指称理论做出辩护,并得出了如下结论:在直接指称理论框架下,虚构专名不同于一般专名:第一,虚构专名有含义,其实质为一簇特定的摹状词;第二,虚构专名有指称,其指称对象是一种特定类型的抽象实体;第三,若以现实世界为视点,含有虚构专名的语句假装表达命题。

关键词: 虚构专名, 摹状词簇, 抽象实体, 假装表达命题

Abstract: Empty names trouble the philosophers, represented by S. Kripke, who accept the Theory of Direct Reference for proper names. The fundamentals about fictional names which acted as one kind of empty names are clear in the paper “Vacuous Names and Fictional Entities” written by S. Kripke. Based on the interpretation of this paper, We will purpose to defend the Theory of Direct Reference, drawing the following conclusions: in the framework of Direct Reference Theory, fictional names are not the same as ordinary proper names. There are three reasons. Firstly, fictional names are meaningful, and their essence is a cluster of definite descriptions. Secondly, fictional names have referents which are called abstract entities of a specific type. Thirdly, in the actual world, those statements containing fictional names pretend to express propositions.

Key words: fictional names, clusters of description, abstract entity, pretending to express propositions

中图分类号: