河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 155-160.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2016.01.026

• 论著 • 上一篇    

普特南内在实在论的人类面孔

梁宗宪 12,张燕京 1   

  1. 1河北大学 政法学院,河北 保定071000;2保定幼儿师范高等专科学校,河北 保定072700
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-26 出版日期:2016-01-25 发布日期:2016-01-25
  • 作者简介:梁宗宪(1969—),男,河北乐亭人,河北大学政法学院2012级逻辑学博士研究生,保定幼儿师范高等专科学校讲师,主要研究方向:逻辑哲学。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“达米特与戴维森意义理论及其对当代逻辑学与哲学的影响之比较研究”(14BZX073)

The Human Face of Putnam’s Internal Realism

LIANG Zong-xian12, ZHANG Yan-jing 1   

  1. 1College of Political Science and Law, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071000; 2Baoding Preschool Teachers College, Baoding, Hebei 072700, China
  • Received:2015-09-26 Online:2016-01-25 Published:2016-01-25

摘要: 基于形而上学实在论和真之符合论存在的问题,普特南提出了内在实在论。他认为我们是在一个理论内部谈论实在,“真”是我们的信念之间以及我们的信念同我们的经验之间的某种理想的融贯,在不同的理论框架内,对同一实在的理论或描述不是唯一的。普特南的内在实在论因带有认识者的面孔而被批评为具有相对主义倾向,但普特南明确了真的标准,承认可接受的合理性标准的客观性。虽然没能彻底避免相对主义,但做出了反对相对主义的有益尝试。

关键词: 形而上学实在论, 内在实在论, 相对主义

Abstract: Based on the retort of metaphysical realism and correspondence theory of truth, Hilary Putnam puts forward internal realism. He thinks that we can talk about reality in a theory, and that truth is a kind of ideal coherence between our beliefs and experience. He points out that under different theoretical frameworks, the theories or descriptions of same reality are not the one and the only. With a knower face, Putnam's internal realism has been criticized for its relativist tendency. But Putnam clarifies the standard of truth, and admits the objectivity of acceptable rationalization standard. Although not completely avoiding relativism, Putnam makes a useful attempt against relativism.

Key words: metaphysical realism, internal realism, relativism

中图分类号: