河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 120-131.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2024.05.011

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    

范式的转向:党内法规党外效力证成范式的学说演进及其反思

王建芹1,陈思羽2   

  1. 1.内蒙古大学 法学院, 内蒙古 呼和浩特 010021;
    2.北京大学 马克思主义学院, 北京 100871
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-01 发布日期:2024-09-11
  • 作者简介:王建芹(1963—),女,山东昌邑人,博士,内蒙古大学特聘教授,中国政法大学党规研究中心教授,主要研究方向:宪法与行政法学、纪检监察学、党内法规学。 陈思羽(1998—),男,河南郑州人,北京大学马克思主义学院博士研究生,主要研究方向:纪检监察学、党内法规学、党的建设。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部重大攻关课题“提高一体化推进‘三不腐’能力和水平研究”(22JZD022)

Paradigm Turn: The Doctrinal Evolution and Reflection of the Paradigm of Extra Force about Party Regulations

WANG Jianqin1,CHEN Siyu2   

  1. 1.School of Law, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010021; 2.School of Marxism, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • Received:2024-03-01 Published:2024-09-11

摘要: 学界对党内法规党外效力证成范式的发展,经过了间接影响论、宪制逻辑论、社会系统论和党政关系论四重范式的转向。无论何种进路,在理论供给侧均无法满足证成的需求,或与党内法规实践相脱节,或存在逻辑上的矛盾,或在证成性、说服性与方法科学性上有待商榷。文章总结反思了不同进路的优缺点,认为只有从党内法规生长的本土逻辑与自我指向中才能建构一套符合党内法规党外效力证成需求的理论逻辑。

关键词: 党内法规, 党外效力, 正当性, 证成范式, 学说史

Abstract: The development of the paradigm of the force about Party regulations in the academic circles has gone through the turn of the quadruple paradigm of the theory of indirect influence,the theory of constitutional logic,the theory of social systems, and the relationship between the Party and the government. No matter what approach is taken,it cant meet the needs of proof on the supply side of theory,or it is out of touch with the practice of Party regulations,or there are logical contradictions,or it is debatable in terms of proof,persuasiveness and scientific methodology.This paper summarizes and reflects on the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches,and argues that only from the local logic and self-orientation of the growth of Party regulations can a set of theoretical logic that meets the needs of the force of Party regulations outside the Party be constructed.

Key words: Party regulations, extra force, legitimacy, proof paradigm, the history of doctrine

中图分类号: