河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (6): 84-93.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2025.06.009

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    

论网络诽谤信息传播情况的司法判断

王志祥,吴超莹   

  1. 北京师范大学 刑事法律科学研究院, 北京 100875
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-17 发布日期:2025-11-19
  • 作者简介:王志祥(1971—),男,河南南阳人,博士,北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院教授、博士生导师,主要研究方向:中国刑法学。 吴超莹(1998—),女,河南新乡人,北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院博士研究生,主要研究方向:中国刑法学。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目“形式理性与实质理性的关系在刑法学中的展开研究”(21BFX009)

On the Judicial Judgment of Dissemination Situation of Online Defamatory Information

WANG Zhixiang,WU Chaoying   

  1. College of Criminal Law Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2025-02-17 Published:2025-11-19

摘要: 作为诽谤罪中“情节严重”的认定依据,网络诽谤行为中网络诽谤信息的传播情况面临因果关系的判断问题和传播次数的认定问题。网络诽谤行为侵害的法益包括被害人的名誉权和网络空间秩序。在网络诽谤行为中,传播行为属于介入因素。在认定因果关系时,应当先比较行为人的诽谤行为与传播行为对危害结果的因果力。由于二者因果力大小没有明显区别,进而应判断传播行为的异常性。异常性的判断有三个维度,即介入因素的预见可能性、先前行为与介入因素的关联性和介入因素本身的正当性。在认定传播次数时,应当扣除不涉及实质侵害法益的传播行为。在计算网络诽谤信息的点击、浏览次数时,应当扣除被害人和机器人的点击、浏览量,对网站管理人员的点击、浏览量则无需予以扣除。在计算网络诽谤信息的转发数量时,应当将机器人的转发量纳入计算范围。

关键词: 网络诽谤, 情节严重, 传播情况, 介入因素, 法益侵害

Abstract: As the basis for determining “serious circumstances” in the crime of defamation,the dissemination situation of online defamatory information faces issues of the judgment of causality and the determination of the frequency of dissemination.The legal interests infringed by the act of online defamation include the victims right to reputation and the order of cyberspace.In the act of online defamation,dissemination behavior is an intervening factor.When determining causality,the causal power of the perpetrators defamatory behavior and dissemination behavior on the harmful consequences should be compared firstly.Since there is no significant difference in the magnitude of the causal force between the two,it is necessary to determine the abnormality of the dissemination behavior.The judgment of abnormality has three dimensions,namely the foreseeable possibility of intervention factors,the correlation between previous behavior and intervention factors,and the legitimacy of intervention factors themselves.When determining the frequency of dissemination,the portion of dissemination that does not substantially infringe on legal interests should be deducted.When calculating the number of clicks and views of defamatory information,the clicks and views of the victim and the robots should be deducted,while the clicks and views of website administrators do not need to be deducted.When calculating the number of reposts of defamatory information,the reposts of robots should be included in the calculation scope.

Key words: online defamation, serious circumstances, dissemination situation, intervention factors, infringement of legal interests

中图分类号: