河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 43-49.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2019.02.007

• 哲学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论黄道周的《孝经》学思想

许卉   

  1. 河北省社会科学院 哲学所, 河北 石家庄 050051
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-10 出版日期:2019-03-25 发布日期:2019-03-25
  • 作者简介:许卉(1978—),女,陕西户县人,哲学博士,河北省社会科学院助理研究员,主要研究方向:中国哲学。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省社科基金项目“黄道周经学思想及其历史地位研究”(HB16ZX008);河北省社会科学院重点项目“晚明古典《孝经》学的重构与超越”(2018A17)

Analysis on Huang Daozhous Thought of Filial Piety

XU Hui   

  1. Institute of Philosophy, Hebei Academy of Social Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, China
  • Received:2018-11-10 Online:2019-03-25 Published:2019-03-25

摘要: 明末大儒黄道周通过对宋明时期具有支配地位的朱熹《孝经》学的反驳与厘正,形成了自己独特的《孝经》学。他认为《孝经》是“六经之本”“治化之纲领”;肯定了《孝经》文本的权威性、完整性,认为《孝经》皆“夫子本语”,不分经传,努力恢复《孝经》原貌;从新的角度阐释“严父配天”,突出孝道的普世性、超越性。黄道周的《孝经》学被后人极为推崇,俨然成为明代《孝经》学的一个高峰。

关键词: 黄道周, 朱熹, 《孝经》, 《孝经刊误》

Abstract: Even though Zhu Xis Filial Piety had a dominant influence during the Song and Ming Dynasties, Huang Daozhou had tried to refute and correct the former viewpoints. Daozhou believed that Filial Piety was the foundation of the Six Classics and it was an outline of governance; He affirmed the authority and integrity of the text of Filial Piety, and believed it recorded the words of Confucius. He insisted Filial Piety should not be divided into two departs of Jing and Zhuan and tried to restored the original appearance of Filial Piety. He also explained the meaning of Yanfupeitian and highlighted the universality and transcendence of filial piety. Huang Daozhous Filial Piety was highly respected by later generations, which became a peak of the study of Filial Piety in the Ming Dynasty.

Key words: Huang Daozhou, Zhu Xi

中图分类号: