河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 126-134.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2022.02.016

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

环境公益诉讼模式的重构——基于制度本质的回归

梁平,潘帅   

  1. 华北电力大学 法政系, 河北 保定 071003
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-16 出版日期:2022-03-25 发布日期:2022-03-25
  • 作者简介:梁平(1968—),女,河北秦皇岛人,华北电力大学法政系教授、博士生导师,主要研究方向:诉讼法与国家治理。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“新时代法治型国家治理研究”(19BFX006)

Reconstruction of Environmental Public Interest Litigation Model ——Regression Based on the Essence of System

LIANG Ping,PAN Shuai   

  1. Department of Law and Political Science, North China Electric Power University, Baoding, Hebei 071003, China
  • Received:2021-08-16 Online:2022-03-25 Published:2022-03-25

摘要: 从当前立法和司法实践来看,中国的环境公益诉讼呈现出“公权主导”和“民主行辅”的制度模式,这在一定程度上偏离了环境公益诉讼的制度本质与核心价值,由此造成主体困境、法理困境、制度困境等诸多问题。通过域外经验考察, 中国应当秉持行政执法优先的理念,建立激励机制,发展以社会力量为主导的环境公益诉讼。具体以行政公益诉讼为主,发挥司法监督功能;以民事公益诉讼为辅,运用惩罚性赔偿发挥震慑功能,回归环境公益诉讼制度本质。

关键词: 环境公益诉讼, 诉讼模式重构, 制度本质

Abstract: From the current legislative and judicial practice,Chinas environmental public interest litigation presents the institutional model of “public power leading” and “democratic supplementary”,which deviates from the institutional essence and core value of environmental public interest litigation to a certain extent,resulting in many problems,such as subject dilemma,legal dilemma,institutional dilemma and so on.Through the investigation of foreign experience,China should uphold the concept of giving priority to administrative law enforcement,establish an incentive mechanism and develop environmental public interest litigation led by social forces.Concretely,it should focus on administrative public interest litigation and give full play to the function of judicial supervision;be supplemented by civil public interest litigation,and punitive compensation is used to play a deterrent function,in order to return to the essence of the environmental public interest litigation system.

Key words: environmental public interest litigation, reconstruction of litigation mode, institutional essence

中图分类号: