河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (6): 115-127.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2025.06.012

• 教育学研究 • 上一篇    

学术漂移与职业本位:英德本科职业教育差异化发展的制度机制及对中国的启示

郭卉,邢少乐   

  1. 华中科技大学 教育科学研究院, 湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-04 发布日期:2025-11-19
  • 作者简介:郭卉(1979—),女,湖南常德人,博士,华中科技大学教育科学研究院教授、博士生导师,主要研究方向:高等工程教育、学术职业。 邢少乐(1998—),女,山东烟台人,华中科技大学教育科学研究院博士研究生,主要研究方向:职业教育、高等工程教育。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金教育学重大课题“高校与地方行业企业合作新机制研究”(VJA230009)

Academic Drift and Vocational Orientation:Institutional Mechanisms of Differentiated Development in Undergraduate Vocational Education in the UK and Germany and Implications for China

GUO Hui,XING Shaole   

  1. School of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2025-08-04 Published:2025-11-19

摘要: 随着全球产业结构的转型升级,推动本科职业教育类型化发展,已成为回应高层次技术技能人才培养需求的关键。引入新制度主义理论,构建“制度环境—行动者策略”互动分析框架,比较英德两国本科职业教育差异化发展的制度机制。研究发现:英国多科技术学院深陷“学术漂移”困境,其根源在于规制性、规范性和文化—认知性制度要素共同导向学术逻辑,促使院校通过模仿学术型大学来获取合法性。相较之下,德国应用科学大学能够建构并发展“职业本位”,关键在于三类制度要素协同支撑职业逻辑,激发州政府与院校的制度创业行为,逐步建立起职业教育体系的内在合法性。在此基础上,研究可知:中国需强化中央政府顶层设计的连续性与引领性,提升省级政府的统筹协调能力,推动职业本科院校在“职业性”与“高等性”深度融合中重构育人和科研模式,系统破解类型教育的合法性困境。

关键词: 本科职业教育, 学术漂移, 职业本位, 制度机制, 中国启示

Abstract: Amid the ongoing transformation and upgrading of global industrial structures,promoting the typological development of undergraduate vocational education has become a key strategy to meet the urgent demand for high-level technical and skilled personnel.Drawing on new institutionalism,this study constructs an analytical framework based on the interaction between institutional environment and actor strategies to examine the institutional mechanisms behind the differentiated development of undergraduate vocational education in the UK and Germany.The findings reveal that multi disciplinary technical colleges in the UK are deeply mired in the dilemma of “academic drift”,which is rooted in regulatory,normative,and cultural cognitive institutional elements that jointly guide academic logic,prompting institutions to obtain legitimacy by imitating academic universities.In contrast,the key to German universities of applied sciences being able to construct and develop a “career oriented” system relies on the synergy of three types of institutional elements to support career logic,stimulate institutional entrepreneurship behavior between state governments and universities,and gradually establish the inherent legitimacy of the vocational education system.On this basis,this article proposes that China needs to strengthen the continuity and leadership of the top-level design of the central government,enhance the overall coordination ability of provincial governments,promote vocational undergraduate colleges to reconstruct their education and research models in the deep integration of “vocation” and “higher education”,and systematically solve the legitimacy dilemma of type education.

Key words: undergraduate vocational education, academic drift, vocational orientation, institutional mechanism, implications for China

中图分类号: