河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 148-152.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2019.03.021

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论贩卖毒品罪既遂标准的模糊化认定

梅传强,张喆锐   

  1. 西南政法大学 国家毒品问题治理研究中心, 重庆 401120
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-30 出版日期:2019-05-25 发布日期:2019-05-25
  • 作者简介:梅传强(1965—),男,四川邻水人,法学博士,西南政法大学教授国家毒品问题治理研究中心教授,主要研究方向:刑法学、犯罪心理学。
  • 基金资助:
    2017年度国家社会科基金重点项目“预防性防恐刑法问题研究”(17AFX017);国家毒品问题治理研究中心2018年度研究项目“东南沿海地区毒品犯罪实证研究”(DR(2018)Y019)

On the Fuzzification of the Standard of the Accomplished Offense of Drug Trafficking

MEI Chuan-qiang, ZHANG Zhe-rui   

  1. National Research Center of Drug Issues Governance, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China
  • Received:2018-06-30 Online:2019-05-25 Published:2019-05-25

摘要: 对于贩卖毒品罪既遂标准的把握,司法实务界与刑法理论界一直争论不休。司法人员在面对把握不准的停止形态认定时,倾向于将其认定为犯罪既遂,而有学者认为这与刑法既遂理论相矛盾。关于贩卖毒品罪既遂与未遂间关系,可以适当予以模糊。因为贩卖毒品行为本身具有极强的隐蔽性,而且在法教义学视角,犯罪未遂与犯罪既遂的区别仅在于违法性程度上的不同。在考虑贩卖毒品罪的量刑问题时,只需在认定其犯罪成立的基础上,对其结果不法予以考量即可。

关键词: 贩卖毒品罪, 犯罪未遂, 犯罪既遂, 违法性程度

Abstract: Judicial practice and the criminal law theory community have been arguing over the standard of accomplished offense of drug trafficking. Judicial personnel tend to identify them as crimes in the face of undetermined form of uncompleted crimes, and some scholars believe that this contradicts the theory of criminal law. The relationship between the accomplished offense and the attempted offense of drug trafficking can be appropriately blurred. The reason lies in the specific concealment of the behavior itself, and in the perspective of jurisprudence, the difference between the attempted offense and the accomplished offense is only the difference in the degree of illegality. When considering the sentencing problem of drug trafficking, it is necessary to identify the establishment of the crime and the degree of result illegality.

Key words: drug trafficking offence, attempted offense, accomplished offense, degree of illegality

中图分类号: