河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 71-76.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2016.04.010

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

转喻回指照应的认知语用阐释

江晓红   

  1. 肇庆学院 外国语学院,广东 肇庆526061
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-10 出版日期:2016-07-25 发布日期:2016-07-25
  • 作者简介:江晓红(1967—),女,四川泸州人,博士,广东肇庆学院外国语学院教授,主要研究方向:语用学, 认知语言学。
  • 基金资助:
    广东省哲学社会科学“十二五”规划项目(GD14CWW04);广东省高等学校高层次人才项目(粤财教[2013]246号);广东省教育厅重大项目(2014WZDXM041)

A Cognitive Pragmatic Approach to Metonymic Anaphor

JIANG Xiao hong   

  1. School of Foreign Languages, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, Guangdong, 526061, China
  • Received:2016-03-10 Online:2016-07-25 Published:2016-07-25

摘要: 回指在传统上被认为是建立在语言表层上的互指关系,但转喻回指往往涉及一种没有明确先行项的深层回指。深层回指由语用因素控制,且须从认知角度来解释。在认知语用框架下,探讨了转喻回指照应机制,指出转喻回指是在特定语境条件下,以言者表达的意图为主导,听者的认知推理为导向,在寻求转喻回指的关联性解读过程中建立先行词与回指语之间的语义连通。

关键词: 转喻指称, 回指, 认知语用, 照应机制

Abstract: Anaphora is traditionally taken as co-reference at the linguistic level, but metonymic anaphor, which belongs to deep anaphora with no clear antecedent, is controlled by pragmatic and cognitive factors. With in the framework of cognitive pragmatics, this paper discusses the mechanism of metonymic anaphora, and points out that in a specific context metonymic anaphora is motivated by speaker’s reference and constructed by means of hearer’s inference. It is the attempt to make an utterance relevant that ultimately establishes the conceptual connectivity between antecedent and anaphor.

Key words: referential metonymy, anaphor, cognitive pragmatics, reference mechanism

中图分类号: