河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 145-149.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2017.01.022

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

非法证据排除规则之程序优化路径

周书霞,马洪亮   

  1. 中央司法警官学院 法学院,河北 保定071000
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-20 出版日期:2017-01-25 发布日期:2017-01-25
  • 作者简介:周书霞(1975—),女,河北赵县人,中央司法警官学院法学院副教授,主要研究方向:诉讼法学。
  • 基金资助:
    2015年度司法部课题“法治中国视野下司法人权保障路径探析”(15SFB5005)

Analysis on the Program Optimization Pathof Illegal Evidence Exclusion Rule

ZHOU Shu xia, MA Hong liang   

  1. School of Law, The Central Institute for Correctional Police, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China
  • Received:2016-11-20 Online:2017-01-25 Published:2017-01-25

摘要: 非法证据排除规则在司法实践中出现了程序运行方面的一些问题,在规则的启动程序方面存在诸多阻滞因素,审判程序中的运行也出现诸多问题,如缺乏独立的非法证据排除的前置程序,检察院的证明方式有待进一步完善,非法证据的证明标准有待具体化,法律救济的途径不明确等,使得该规则在审判程序中也有形式化之嫌。因此,应该排除程序启动的阻滞因素,进一步使审判程序中的非法证据排除程序实质化,以更好地实现人权保障和司法公正。

关键词: 非法证据, 刑讯逼供, 人权保障

Abstract: There are some problems for the illegal evidence exclusion rule on running of the program in the judicial practice and in the initiating procedure. Besides, there are many problems in trial procedure’s operation, such as lack of independent prepositive procedure of the illegal evidence exclusion, procuratorate’s proof way needing to be further perfected, illegal evidence proving standards needing to be specific, unclear legal relief way and so on. All these make the rules in the trial procedure too formalized. Therefore, the hindering factors of program initiation should be eliminated. The illegal evidence exclusion in the trial program should be substantialized further in order to implement human rights and justice better.

Key words: illegal evidence, extort confessions by torture, human rights protection

中图分类号: