河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 1-9.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2016.05.001

• 论著 •    下一篇

宋代刑部建制述论——制度史的静态研究

龚延明   

  1. 浙江大学 古籍所暨宋学研究中心,浙江 杭州310028
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-10 修回日期:2017-02-13 出版日期:2016-09-25 发布日期:2016-09-25
  • 作者简介:龚延明(1940—),男,浙江义乌人,浙江大学古籍研究所暨宋学研究中心教授、博士研究生导师,主要研究方向:中国古代官制史与科举制度文献整理。

On the Organizational System of the Ministry of Justice in Song Dynasty——The Static Study of Institutional History

GONG Yanming   

  1. Institute for Ancient Books and Center for Song Studies, Zhejiang University,Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310028,China
  • Received:2016-03-10 Revised:2017-02-13 Online:2016-09-25 Published:2016-09-25

摘要: 宋刑部之制,沿袭隋、唐。在宋代,刑部之职能变化,分两个阶段:北宋前期,刑部官员无职事;刑部之权,为审刑院与纠察在京刑狱司所分。但刑部并非空壳,尚掌有昭雪天下死罪之司法权,及犯罪免职官员经赦重新叙用等职事。为宋初四家中央司法机构之一,则大理寺为最高审判机构;审刑院为复议大理寺断案机构;刑部为大辟复核机构;御史台为刑法最高监督机构。元丰五年,行新官制,刑部尚书、侍郎及其所属四司刑部司、都官司、比部司、司门郎中、郎中、员外郎,官复原职。职掌刑法、狱讼、奏谳、赦宥、叙复之政令。元丰改制之后,中央司法机构由四家简为二家,大理寺、刑部,御史台则为司法监督机构未变。天下奏案,必断于大理寺,详议于刑部,然后上之于宰执,决之于皇帝,这就是元丰改制后,确立的宋代刑事审判制度。这也从刑政方面,体现了宋代以皇帝为核心的中央集权的进一步加强。

关键词: 宋代, 刑部建制, 制度史

Abstract: The system of Ministry of Justice (Xingbu) in Song Dynasty inherited from Sui and Tang Dynasties. During Song Dynasty, the functional changes of the Ministry could be divided into two stages:in the early Northern Song Dynasty, the power of the Ministry was deprived by the Punishment Reviewing Office (Shenxinyuan) and the Bureau of Judicial Investigation for the Capital (Jiuchazaijingxingyusi), though the Minstry was not a hollowed out shell as its judicial power to exonerate death row inmates and its duties such as reemploying officers according to the order of pardon remained. Among the four central judicial institutions, the Ministry was responsible for reviewing death penalty; meantime, the Court of Judicial Review (Dalisi) was the highest judicial organization, the Punishment Reviewing Office reviewed the case after the judgement of the Court of Judicial Review, and the Censorate (Yushitai) was the highest judicial supervisory organization. In the 5th year of Yuanfeng, the newly bureaucratic system was promulgated, which indicated the strengthen of the Emperor centred centralization in legal political area in Song Dynasty. The system stipulated the Minister (Shangshu), Vice Minister (Shilang), the Directors (Langzhong) and Vice Directors (Yuanwailang) of the Bureau of Punishments (Xingbusi), the Criminal Administration Bureau (Duguansi), the Bureau of Review (Bibusi) and the Transit Authorization Bureau (Simensi) which were belonged to the Ministry of Justice reinstated their former responsibilities dealing with criminal laws, lawsuits, reporting inextricable cases, absolution and remission, and reemploying officers. After the restructuring, the Court of Judicial Review and the Ministry of Justice were the only two central judicial institutions while the Censorate remained a supervisory organization. Every submitting case should be judged by the Court of Judicial Review, discussed by the Ministry of Justice, presented to the State Councilor (Zaizhi), and decided by the Emperor, which established a criminal trial system of the Song Dynasty.

Key words: Song Dynasty, the system of Ministry of Justice, institutional history

中图分类号: