河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 88-95.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6378.2017.02.013

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

京津冀跨区环境纠纷化解的法制保障

李庆保   

  1. 华北电力大学 法政系,河北 保定071003
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-30 出版日期:2017-03-25 发布日期:2017-03-25
  • 作者简介:李庆保(1973—),男,河南信阳人,华北电力大学法政系副教授,中国政法大学2015级博士研究生,主要研究方向:环境法。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金一般项目“基层治理中社会矛盾化解与法治保障研究”(13BFX009)

Study on Legal Assurance to Resolve Cross regionalEnvironmental Disputes in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei

LI Qingbao   

  1. Department of Law and Political Science, North China Electric Power University, Baoding, Hebei 071000,China
  • Received:2016-12-30 Online:2017-03-25 Published:2017-03-25

摘要: 京津冀跨区环境纠纷产生的原因多种多样,存在着显性和隐性纠纷之别,现行跨区纠纷化解的法制供给只针对有限的显性纠纷且存在诸多不足,而针对隐性纠纷的制度化化解机制阙如。在实施京津冀协同发展战略的背景下,结合三地实际情况以及现行法律框架的基础上,采取有力措施建立健全适用于京津冀三地跨区显性环境纠纷解决的法律机制,同时应建立相关的制度性跨区利益协调机制为化解那些跨区隐性环境纠纷提供保障。

关键词: 跨区环境纠纷, 纠纷解决机制, 京津冀协同发展, 环境法制

Abstract: The cross regional environmental disputes in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei are caused by a variety of reasons and differ in explicit and implicit types. Currently, the legal resolution supply is only limited to some explicit disputes and also has many defects, whereas the institutionalized cross regional interests coordinating mechanism for resolving the implicit disputes is still missing. In the background of implementing Beijing Tianjin Hebei collaborative development strategy, basing on the actual situations of the three administrative areas as well as the current law framework, the powerful measures should be taken to perfect the legal resolution mechanisms focusing on the explicit disputes in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, and meanwhile an institutionalized cross regional interests coordinating system should be established to provide assurances for resolving those cross regional implicit environmental disputes.

Key words: cross-regional environmental disputes, disputes resolution mechanism, BeijingTianjinHebei collaborative development, environmental legal system

中图分类号: